A. |
Ward v Robertson |
B. |
Gordon, Chapter 22 |
C. |
Clark v Syme |
D. |
Farrell v Marshall |
E. |
Glanville Williams, Criminal Law – The General Part (extract) |
F. |
Moss v Howdle |
G. |
Perka and Others v The Queen |
H. |
John v Donnelly |
I. |
Palazzo v Copeland |
J. |
Kent v HM Advocate |
K. |
Renton & Brown, Criminal Procedure, (extract) |
L. |
Oppenheim’s International Law, (extract) |
M. |
Mann, Foreign Affairs in English Courts (extract) |
N. |
Mortensen v Peters |
0. |
T, Petitioner |
P. |
The Cristina |
Q. |
Maclaine Watson v DTI (sub nom JH Rayner (Mincing Lane) Ltd v DTI) |
R. |
Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons |
S. |
UN Charter, Article 2 |
T. |
Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia, Vol 19, “Public International Law” |
U. |
Brownlie, International Law and the Use of Force by States (Extract) |
V. |
Archbold, Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice (extract) |
W. |
Glanville Williams, Criminal Law-The General Part (further extract) |
X. |
O’Connor and Fairall, Criminal Defences (extract) |
Y. |
Stuart, Canadian Criminal Law (extract) |
Z. |
Oppenheim’s International Law, (further extract) |
AA. |
De Souza, “The Role of State Consent in the Customary Process” |
BB. |
Elias, “The Nature of the Subjective Element in Customary International Law” |
CC. |
Cassesse, lnternational Law in a Divided World (extract) |
DD. |
Report of the International Law Commission, 2nd Session (1950), Part 11, “Ways and Means of Making the Evidence of Customary International Law More Readily Available” |
EE. |
International Law Association, Committee on International Law in Municipal Courts, First Report |
FF. |
Geoff Gilbert, “The Criminal Responsibility of States” |
GG. |
Greig, International Law (extract) |