Index of References for Angie Zelter

Ref.1.

Interlocutor Sheets of April 4th 2000 (1a), of September 12th 2000 (1b), and of September 29th 2000 (1c).

Ref.2.

Letters from Angie Zelter to Court of 18/4/00 (2a) and Motions Before the Court on 12/9/00 (2b).

Ref.3.

International Military Tribunal, The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal Sitting at Nuremberg, Germany. Part 22. 28th August 1946, 1946. Taken from the Official Transcript. Published by HMSO, London, 1950.

Ref.4.

UN Doc. No.A/CONF.183/9 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,1998, Preamble and Articles 5, 7, 8, 25 and 28.

Ref.5.

Greenock Defence Production – H14 – Pledge to Prevent Nuclear Crime.

Ref.6.

Greenock Defence Production – H17 – Joint Statement of Zelter, Roder and Moxley, p1.

Ref.7.

Transcript i.c.H M Advocate v. Zelter, Roder and Moxley. October 1999.

Ref.8.

Report of Sheriff Gimblett to Lord Justice General et al, Justiciary Office Lodged on 21 August 2000.

Ref.9.

UN Resolution A/RES/54/54Q on ‘Follow-Up to the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons’.

Ref.10.

Letters from Angie Zelter to Lord Advocate of 18/4/00 (10a) and 22/7/00 (10b) and to the Court of 18/4/00 (2a).

Ref.11.

Lord Advocate’s Reference Petition of the Rt. Honourable the Lord Hardie, Justiciary Office Lodged on 21 January 2000.

Ref.12.

Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, International Court of Justice, General List No. 95, July 8th 1996.

Ref.13.

Times Law Report, 19/5/99, International Law Report, Immunity for United Nations Expert.

Ref.14.

Principles of the Nuremberg Tribunal, 1950.

Ref.15.

President Judge Bedjaoui’s Declaration, Appended to the Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, International Court of Justice, General List No. 95, July 8th 1996.

Ref.16.

Charles J.Moxley, Nuclear Weapons and International Law in the Post Cold War World, Austin and Winfield, 2000.

Ref.17.

1991 NATO Strategic Concept Document, Article 38.

Ref.18.

Nicholas Lyell’s November 15th 1995 Oral Statement, CR 95/34, to the Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, International Court of Justice, General List No. 95, July 8th 1996.

Ref.19.

Christopher Greenwood, International Committee of the Red Cross No.316, p.65-75, January 1997.

Ref.20.

R v. Ministry of Defence, ex p Walker [2000] 1 WLR 806, 812B.

Ref.21.

Additional Protocol 1 of 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, Article 48.

Ref.22.

Commentary of the International Committee of the Red Cross, 1987, para.1863.

Ref.23.

Preparatory Commission for the International Court, PCNICC/1999/WGEC/INF2 Add.1(30 July 1999), p14.

Ref.24.

Prosecutor v. Milan Martic (Rule 61 Decison), Case No. IT-95-11-1 (8 March 1996), paras.8-17.

Ref.25.

UK Strategic Defence Review, Ch.2.23, July 1998.

Ref.26.

“UK Defence Strategy: A Continuing Role for Nuclear Weapons?”, Malcolm Rifkind, Speech to the Center for defence Studies, London, November 16th 1993.

Ref.27.

Nuclear Weapons and the Law, Lord Murray, Medicine, Conflict and Survival, Vol.15, 126-137, 1990.

Ref.28.

Dissenting Opinion of Vice-President Judge Schwebel, p.1, 12. Appended to the Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, International Court of Justice, General List No. 95, July 8th 1996.

Ref.29.

Hansard, House of Commons Debate, February 17th 1998.

Ref.30.

A-Bomb: A City tells its Story, Yoshiteru Kosakai, 1972, (30a) and Hibakusha, Nihon Hidankyo, 1982, (30b) and The Outline of Atomic Bomb Damage in Hiroshima, Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum, June 1999, (30c).

Ref.31.

Ryuichi Shimoda et al vs. The State, Tokyo, December 1963.

Ref.32.

Greenock Defence Production – No.5 – “Trident, Britain’s Weapon of Mass Destruction”, John Ainslie, p.1. March 1999.

Ref.33.

Charter of International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, Article 6.

Ref.34.

Non Governmental Statement to be Submitted to the International Court of Justice, May 3 1995, Japan Center of World Court Project, p.25.

Ref.35.

“The Next Chevaline Scandal?” Alan Simpson MP and CND, August 11th 1999.

Ref.36.

Ian Soutar, UNGA 53, First Committee, UK Explanation of Vote, L.48/Rev 1: Towards a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World: The Need for a New Agenda, 13 November, 1998.

Ref.37.

Final Document Issued By NPT Review Conference, 20th May 2000.

Ref.38.

Letter to Angie Zelter from Hazel Finch, Ministry of Defence, October 23rd 1997.

Ref.39.

Ministry of Defence, UK Crown, 1981. The Law of Armed Conflict, p.38, Section 10, Service Discipline 1.

Ref.40.

Indictment for Conspiracy and incitement, George Delf, 1980’s.

Ref.41.

House of Commons Written Questions, 13 December 1999: Column 40W.

Ref.42.

Geneva Conventions Act, 1957.

Ref.43.

Geneva Conventions (Amendments) Act, 1995.

Ref.44.

International Military Tribunal, The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal Sitting at Nuremberg, Germany. Part 19. 26th July 1946. Taken from the Official Transcript. Published by HMSO, London, 1948.

Ref.45.

M Dixon, Textbook on International Law, 3rd Edition, 1996.

Ref.46.

R v. Bow Street Magistrate, Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 1) [2000] 1 A.C. 61.

Ref.47.

R v. Bow Street Magistrate, Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 3) [2000] 1 A.C. 147.

Ref.48.

Oppenheim’s International Law, Vol.1, 9th Edition, 1992, ed. Sir Robert Jennings QC and Sir Arthur Watts QC.

Ref.49.

(a) Zivilzpozessordnung, Artikel 128; (b) Austrian Code, Artikel 357.

Ref.50.

R.Higgins, Problems and Process, Oxford, 1994, p.213.

Ref.51.

Compania Naviera Vascongado v. S.S. Cristina [1938] A.C. 485 p.497].

Ref.52.

Statute of the International Court of Justice.

Ref.53.

Trendtex [1977] 1 All E.R. 881.

Ref.54.

Piracy June Gentium [1934] A.C. 586.

Ref.55.

Radwan v. Radwan [1972] 3 W.L.R. 735.

Ref.56.

Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law, OUP, 5th edition, p.24-25.

Ref.57.

American Law Institute, Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (Third), Vol.1, 1-488, 1987.

Ref.58.

Disenting Opinion of Judge Weeramantry appended to the Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, International Court of Justice, General List No. 95, July 8th 1996.

Ref.59.

The Zyklon B Case, Hamburg, March, 1946, Trial of Bruno Tesch and Two Others.

Ref.60.

International Military Tribunal, The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal Sitting at Nuremberg, Germany. Part 22, 29th August 1946. Taken from the Official Transcript. Published by HMSO, London,1950.

Ref.61.

International Military Tribunal, The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal Sitting at Nuremberg, Germany. Part 22, 30th August 1946. Taken from the Official Transcript. Published by HMSO, London,1950.

Ref.62.

Hansard H.L. Vol.233. Col.831. 2 Dec ’63.

Ref.63.

Respect the Law: Dismantle Trident – an open letter to Tony Blair from global citizens of Ploughshares 2000.

Ref.64.

State of Vermont v. Harold G McCann. District Court of Vermont, Unit 2, Chittenden Circuit, Docket No. 2857-7-86 CnCr, VT District Court, Jan 26 1987, Chittenden.

Ref.65.

In re Yamashita, 327 US, (1945): United States v. Von Leeb, 11 Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals 426 et.seq. (1948).

Ref.66.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Preambular paras 3 and 8 and Article 28.

Ref.67.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 2(3) and 6(1).

Ref.68.

Letter to Dennis Canavan from Colin Boyd of 2/6/00.

Ref.69.

Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal of Former Yugoslavia, 38 International legal Mat. 1518 (1999) July 15.

Ref.70.

Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 485.

Ref.71.

Corfu Channel Case, ICJ Reports 1949.

Ref.72.

Steele v. United Kingdom (1999) 28 E.H.R.R. 603.

Ref 73.

Judge Ranjeva’s Separate Opinion appended to the Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, International Court of Justice, General List No. 95, July 8th 1996.

Ref.74.

Iatridis v. Greece (2000) 30 E.H.R.R. 97.

Ref.75.

The Use of Trident in War, Professor Paul Rogers, September 2000.

Ref.76.

R.v. Bonadie, 1996 CCC Lexis 2765; 109 C.C.C. 3d 356, Ontario Court, p.31.

Ref.77.

Map of damage to Edinburgh with 100kt Trident warhead – John Ainslie.

Ref.78.

Thinking about Nuclear Weapons, Michael Quinlan, MoD, RUSI.

Ref.79.

Letter of 3rd July 2000 from Alan Hughes, Directorate of Nuclear Policy, MoD, to Angie Zelter.

Ref.80.

House of Commons Written Parliamentary Answer 28/11/91, Hansard Col.642. and Strategic Nuclear Weapons Policy, House of Commons Defence Committee Minutes 17/3/82 on replacement of Chevaline with Trident.

Ref.81.

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, September/October 2000.

Ref.82

Britain Ponders Single Warhead Option, International Defence Review (September, 1994), David Miller.

Ref.83.

NJW (Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (New Juristic Weekly), 2, 1993, pages 141 to 149.

Ref.84.

UN Security Council Resolution S/RES/984/(1995), 11th April 1995.

Ref.85.

Letter of 28/9/00 from Stephen Willmer, Proliferation and Arms Control Secretariat of the Ministry of Defence, to Angie Zelter.

Ref.86.

Judge Shahabuddeen’s Dissenting Opinion appended to the Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, International Court of Justice, General List No. 95, July 8th 1996.

Ref.87.

Trial of Wilhelm List and Others, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, UN War Crimes Commission (HMSO, London, 1949), Vol 8, p 67.

Ref.88.

Digest of Law and Cases, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, UN War Crimes Commission (HMSO, London, 1949), Vol 15, p 175.

Ref.89.

Trial of German High Command, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, UN War Crimes Commission (HMSO, London, 1949), Vol 12, pp 123-127.

Ref.90.

Krupp Trial, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, UN War Crimes Commision (HMSO, London 1949), Vol 10, p 139.